Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

RE: Re: Inverted Noblex?

  • From: Stan Patz <skp113@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Inverted Noblex?
  • Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:17:32 -0800 (PST)

>From: James Romeo <jromeo@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>I do not understand ???  N0 matter which whay you do it it is the same 
>result. If you mont the Noblex upside down or lower the tripoid it is the 
>same thing.You get more forground and less harizon. If I am using my view 
>camera and I shift the lens or lower or rise the tripod again it is the 
>same end. The reson for a shift is you do not need a ladder to see the 
>ground glass or sit on the grood to look thoug the ground glass. So why is 
>turing a camera upside down  better than lowering or rising my Noblex?

Dear James,

Maybe when you are looking at distant scenes, there is no difference between 
lowering the camera or shifting the lens. But if you want to keep the back 
straight so vertical lines do not converge, and you want more foreground, 
the only solution is to shift.

Lowering the camera will change your perspective.

Stan Patz   NYC
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com