Re: Bios and self-portraits in expo2

["Lauren Michaels" <lem@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> >The bio thing is just bragging. It has nothing
> >to do with stereo photography. 
>  
> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding here... By "bio" we mean (or at 
> least this is how I interpret it) mostly stereo bio.  We don't care 
> how tall Lauren is, if she is single or married or what she does for 
> living. 

Have you never submitted a bio? That's what a bio is....Name, city, place of
employment, education, spouse and/or children, organizations, and so forth.
That's a bio. I *have* a bio and a press release. I just don't want to
submit them to the expo. It has nothing to do with stereo photography.
I value my anonyminity on the internet and would like to keep it that way.

> Wouldn't it be nice to know how we look so we can recognize each other and
> avoid the usual remark: "Hey, you don't look like anything I had
> imagined..."?

Wouldn't it be awfully awkward to think up some other 1st thing to say to
someone you've "known" for years but never actually met?

> In any case, no one is forcing anyone to do anything other than follow 
> some basic rules.  The stereo biography should be optional and so 
> should be the sheet with information about the images and also the 
> feedback to other people's images.

The bio should be eliminated and the info sheet should be required!

-- 
Signature Deprivation Experiment #3905 beginning now:


------------------------------