Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re:Re:Nimslo vs "real" 3D Camera

  • From: GCCampos@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re:Re:Nimslo vs "real" 3D Camera
  • Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:17:08 -0500
Tom, In a message dated 96-02-26 19:46:54 EST, you write:
> If you mean stereo prints from the Nimslo then I agree they are awful. But
that
> is an artifact of the print process, not the lenses.

What is awjul about the Nimslo prints?  Are you suggesting that for trip to
places I may never see again, I should use slide film?

>Without doing any measurements, I have found slides taken in the Nimslo 
>are just as good as those taken in my Realist 3.5. Plus, refocussing the
>two middle lenses to about 2.5' means that I can take pictures of flowers
etc
>without focus problems and without hyperstereo effects.

How do you refocus the two middle lenses?

Any help will be appreciated.

Grant


------------------------------