Re: "Collecting" vs. "Owing and not using"

[fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dr. George A. Themelis)]

>I'm not sure I see the distinction between being a collector of images
>and a collector of historical photo technology items. 

Let me help you:  People actually use these stereo cameras to take
pictures.  I understand collecting "historical photo technology items" that
are not in service any more but please don't compare perfectly usuable
stereo cameras with stamps.

Images were made to be be collected.  When you look at a picture or
read a book you are using the item as it was intented to be used.  Books
can be found or loaned through libraries.  Yet, one cannot find or borrow
to use a stereo camera from similar institutions.

I have no problem with decleared collectors like the lady from Cincinatti
who's mission is to learn, collect, display and educate us in a specialized
area of stereo photography.  But I do have a problem with the person who
swears that he/she is a "user" and has pilled up a few dozen cameras and
viewers so that they can satisfy their anxiety of having the best stereo
gear and every little gadget ever known to the human race in their disposal.

Perhaps a poll would confirm my suspicion that those "users" who own the 
most stereo cameras are the ones who take the least amount of pictures?

George Themelis


------------------------------