Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Waack nomographs, etc.
- From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Waack nomographs, etc.
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 09:40:25 -0500
John Bercovitz wrote:
> The Kodak (snip)
> (I don't think I'd call it a point and shoot since you have to
> adjust f/stop, shutter speed, and distance.)
Only thing I'd add here is that I think I agree with Ted's original tag
of "Point & Shoot" for the Kodak, in that the camera's controls are
marked for common exposure settings of sunny, cloudy, etc, for asa 10
Kodachrome, and it had "zone focus" settings. To my knowledge, it is the
only common stereo camera to have these "operator friendly" features
which attempted to simplify camera operation for the less technical
photographer.
Regarding the lenses, although there is lots of anecdotal testimony
heralding one cooke triplet lens over another (some people favor the
TDC's Rodenstocks, others the Wirgin's Steinheils, or the early
Realist's Ilexs), they all seem to be relatively close in construction
and performance, with the possible exception of lens coatings. Some of
these lenses, such as the Ilexs, seem to have a heavier coating than
others, and yield a bit more "snap" or contrast, which looks sharper.
I've also heard it said that the Kodaks built-in series V filter holders
seem to act as lens shades, and help make for some good contrasty
images.
My own experience has been that there is tremendous individual variation
with all of these cameras, because the lenses were largely hand ground
and hand fitted, and the cameras were hand assembled. Of necessity, all
of this was done to production tolerances that by modern standards would
be marginal. So, if you happen across a 50s stereo camera which appears
to be nice and sharp, stick with it!
One more point with the kodak... suggest you don't believe the DOF scale
markings on the camera, as they are about two stops beyond a generally
accepted circle of confusion of 1/1000". I have found that using the
indicated markings of f/8 while the aperture is actually set at f/16,
5.6 for 11, 4 for 8, etc, seems to work well.
Eric G.
egoldste@xxxxxx
------------------------------
|