Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1264

[P3D Jim Crowell <crowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 10:55 AM 4/4/96, P3D Jim Roberts wrote:
>
>Regarding the stereo print, I suppose that if one gave up any hope of
>viewing the print without polarizers, that it would not be too difficult,
>technologically, but without the polarizers, the print would be pretty
>distorted (place the left and right chips of a Realist pair over each other
>and view the resulting image, or just view an anaglyph without filters.)

Or you could put a continuously rotating plarizer over the light
source & get a moving picture!

-Jim C.


------------------------------------------------
Jim Crowell
School of Optometry
360 Minor Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-2020
(510) 642-7679
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://john.berkeley.edu/IndividualPages/jim.html



------------------------------