Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Talkin' Stereoviews
- From: P3D Bob Wier <wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Talkin' Stereoviews
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 17:44:23 -0600
>rather advanced age and does not use a computer... (note: this is
>statistics... please do not write to me to tell me that you are a young
>collector with a computer... ;))
>
>George Themelis
How about an old collector with a computer :-)
Actually this is an interesting problem. I got into view collection not
as an end in itself but as a) I am investigating (or was) using computer
technology to preserve/restore historic images - and views were the
easiest to obtain "real photos" when I started, and b) one of the
things I do otherwise is study Victorian house architecture (which
is best done via photos).
There *are* counter arguments, though. I have almost completely given
up taking pictures (especially mono) on my travels in the West, since
I decided I did not want to view the world in general from behind a
viewfinder. I probably have a couple of thousand mono prints that
I will never look at (the fall color season in the mountains is
particularly hard to pass up because it's so fleeting - but after
you have a few hundred prints of the same yellow trees in various
years, there doesn't seem to be much point).
My folks did that a lot - I'm still sorting thru 35mm mono
slides 10 years after they passed away, and I'm canning 95% of them since
they are of people/places that don't mean anything to me and are likely
not to be of historic value. AND they never really had the time and /or
inclination to go back and look at them in their later years. About the
only things we looked at consistenly were Kodachrome (I) 8 mm movies
from the late 40's/early 50's when us kids were small - that was
perhaps once a year.
That's one reason I always tell people (when they will listen, which
is infrequently) that it's a big mistake to exclusively videotape
family type "movies". Unless transferred to the current technology
(DVD is coming on strong) they will be lost in a relatively short
period (say, 20 - 25 years) (sigh).
THANKS
-------- Bob Wier ----- wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----
East Texas State University Computer Science Dept.
keeper of the Motorola MC68HC11, ICOM Radio, and
Overland-Trails mailing lists and the LDS Genealogy
State Research Outlines
"Congress - n. - the antonym of Progress"
stereo smiley : -) : - )
------------------------------
|