Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Digital vs. scanning
- From: P3D Gavin Stokes <gstokes@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Digital vs. scanning
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 02:25:20 -0500
Greg Wageman said:
"But I still don't believe (and I'd like to be shown otherwise) that a
slide scanner in the same ballpark is going to produce a significantly
better image. And certainly not an "INFINITELY" better one. To get
a significantly better image, you need a much higher resolution imaging
element, and those cost big bucks."
It may not be valid to compare a scanner's element to the pickup in the
camera. A camera grabs the entire frame at once, so the image resolution is
limited by that of the imaging chip. A scanner has the leisure to move a
pinpoint sensor or a beam of light across the slide, line by line. For
example, I've seen professional color scanners for newspaper production that
use a spinning drum like an old fax machine.
Gavin
------------------------------
|