Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: 3d Camara - Need advice!
- From: P3D Peter Davis <pdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: 3d Camara - Need advice!
- Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 10:00:44 -0400
> QUESTION:
> What is the best affordable (under $200 Used) 3D camara?
There's no simple answer to this question. To start, some of the
alternatives are:
o Single camera, weight shift technique
You take a picture, shift the camera horizontally about 2 1/2
to 3 inches (without changing the direction of the lens), and
take another picture. Simple, but reasonably effective. Not
good for moving subjects, obviously. An excellent print
viewer (View-Magic) can be gotten for about $30.
o Single camera, "splitter" attachment
The attachment fits on your camera lens, and basically puts
two, half-width images on a single frame of film. Splitters
can cost anywhere from $50 to $250, and they impose some
limitations on the lens and aperature you can use. No special
processing is required, but you'll need a viewer. Viewers
can range from very cheap up to about $150. Since the image
is split, you'll get tall, skinny images. Also, you get some
"keystoning" distortion to to the non-orthogonal light path,
but this is generally not objectionable.
o Realist format camera
This format was extremely popular in the late 1940's and
1950's, so there's a fairly plentiful supply of cameras and
accessories on the used market. The image format is roughly
square. Realist cameras are extremely durable. Film can
be processed normally, but requires special mounting. Kodalux
still does the mounting commercially for a reasonable fee,
although enthusiasts feel they can do a better job themselves.
A viewer is required, and these range from $3 (for unlighted
ones) up to $100 or more for lighted ones. Projectors are
also available. Other models, such as Kodak, Revere, TDC,
etc. are also available, and have advantages and disadvantages
when compared with the Realist.
o European format camera
These are similar to the Realist format, but the images are
wider (7 perforations on the film as opposed to 5). One line
of these, the FED, is still being manufactured, and is
available through various importers, including some on this
list. I don't know if the price fits your guidelines. You'll
have to mount the slides yourself. I don't know about
availability of 7P viewers, but many Realist format viewers
can be adapted for the wider format. I'm not sure if this
even fits in your price range.
o Twin 35mm cameras
Two cameras (the choice of make/model is yours), generally
mounted on a rigid bar to keep them spaced and aligned
correctly. Normal processing can be used for either prints
or slides ... viewers are available for both at a range
of prices. The width of the cameras forces a slight
hyperstereo (exaggerated depth) effect, because the lenses
are further apart than human eyes. Synchronization of the
shutters, especially with flash, may be a problem. Some
cameras can be electronically wired together to synchronize.
"Y" cables are available for cameras which accept a cable
release.
There are other options, but I think they mostly get out of your price
range. Notably, View-Master cameras can be used for making your own
View-Master reels, but equipment is scarce and expensive. There are
also larger format cameras, but these tend to be expensive as well.
Now that I've said all this, I'm sure I'll be flamed by the supporters
of each format for leaving out whatever they consider to be the main
benefits of their favorites.
> P.S. Anyone know of a Faq that explains Lenticular and other formats. I'm not
> really interested in buying one, but I'd like to know about them. I
> can't imagine why you would want 4 lens's! Thanks for any info.....
My understanding is that unlike a slide in a viewer, where the viewing
angle is controlled, a print can be viewed from a variety of angles.
Therefore, multiple views are helpful to ensure that each eye sees an
appropriate image
-pd
--------
Peter Davis "Education is not the 617/873-4145
BBN Educational Technologies filling of a pail, but FAX: 617/873-2455
70 Fawcett Street the lighting of a fire." pdavis@xxxxxxx
Cambridge, MA 02138 -- W. B. Yeats
URL: http://copernicus.bbn.com/people/PDavis/
------------------------------
|