Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
TWIN ARGUS C3s
- From: P3D <GCCampos@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: TWIN ARGUS C3s
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 21:11:23 -0400
I got Micheal Watters' permission to put his responses to my messages about
combining two Argus C3s. Here's what he's done:
> Yup,
> I've indeed cut and paste a pair of trusty old C3's. The camera right now
is
> in the final stages of tweaking. That means: adjusting the exposures so
they
> are accurate and making sure it is flash synced. (I've also got to build
the
> hot-shoe adapter, but I'm making that from an old bulb attachment so no
problem.)
>
> The bare-bones simplicity of the C3 is what made the project appealing and
to
> be honest fairly simple. It's one of the FEW examples of a camera that
gives
> you a very simple shutter mechanism (making the shutter link easy). The
film
> wind is NOT linked to shutter cocking (thus you get 1:3:1 advance by just
> blacking out some of the umbers on the film counter to keep track of what
> frames to skip). The bodies are VERY square (making the joining easy).
> If you have the equipment, you can even weld the front and rear plates into
> solid units.
>
> In addition, the c3 had interchangable lenses. So with a little looking at
shows,
> you can get 35mm lenses and 100mm lenses (in addition to the stock 50mm's).
> The lack of appeal of the C3 to collectors assures that it can be picked up
fairly
> cheaply (ie no more than $5 for each body, the extra lenses are more
expensive
> though, probably more like $30-$40 each. Still cheap compared to SLR
lenses.)
>
> I've got a full lens set, and all seem nicely sharp so far. I haven't done
any critical
> testing though and one of my 100mm's needs to be replaced. It's either
very soft
> or has WAY too much flare in the highlights in it, I can't tell the diff
right now.
>
> Did you have any questions about it???
> mike
> watters
Then in response to some of my questions he wrote:
> Seperation:
> The lenses are 76mm apart. The width of a 35mm frame (including the spaces
> between frames) is 38mm and there is one frame between the two being shot.
> The film is advanced in a 1:3:1 style, manually.
>
> Focus:
>
> I left them to be focussed seperately. However, it probably wouldn't be
TOO
> hard to rig it up so they were synced using the removable gears that are
used
> to sync the lenses to the rangefinder. Wasn't important enough to me to
> bother though. Same with syncing the f-stops. More of a pain that it was
worth
> to me.
> Non-matched cameras:
> I'm not enough of an Argus expert to say exactly what you've got. I'm
guessing
> it's a variation on the C3. You'll definatly want the cameras and lenses
to be
> matched though.
> Nice thing about Argus, if you screw up you're not out much money. :)
> mike
> watters
He might sign up again to monitor the responses.
------------------------------
|