slides vs prints

[P3D Ronald J Beck 840196 <rbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For what it's worth, I started my 3D adventure using two cameras and 
shooting slide film.  Why?  Because the dual 2x2 slide viewer from Reel 3D 
was rather inexpensive (under $5.00?), I had two 35mm cameras with 55mm 
lenses and we have a 1 hour slide developing lab in the area.  So, it was 
pretty much an easy choice for my first attempt at 3D.

Now, I tend to use cheap disposable cameras mounted to an "L" shaped board 
I fabricated and get prints back.  Why?  Well, thanks to the generosity of 
Tim Klein (who's name I haven't seen grace these pages in _SOME_ time!), 
I'm now the proud owner of a View Magic over/under print viewer.  I like 
this a little better because it's easier to present to people.

I still like slides because (IMHO) I feel the colors are more vibrant and 
with the little hand viewer I feel immersed in the scene.

Oh, in addition to the dual camera rigs I've used in the past I've also 
got some excellent results with a single SLR and the "weight shift 
method".  So, use whatever film you feel comfortable with and have a GREAT 
time.  After all, that's what it's all about.

Regards,
Ron

photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 1996,  Alan Rogers  <alan_rogers@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> >i'm new to this, so pardon the following stupid question... I was 
> told that >i should shoot 3d's on slide film only. is this true? the 
> problem with slide >film is its sensitivity - no latitude like you 
> get with print film. my >problem is my camera is built from cheapie 
> point and shoot 35's with fixed >focus lenses, aperture and shutter 
> speed. not a good combination for >sensitive film.

> > suggestions or help. for what it's worth, i haven't shot my first 
> roll(s) >with this yet, i'm waiting for advice.

> > -alan




------------------------------