Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Shift lenses
- From: P3D John Bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Shift lenses
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 19:27:46 -0700
Wm. C. writes:
> Keep the film plane parallel to the screen...
John B responds:
>Can anyone explain how this cures keystone? It's not intuitively
>obvious to me.
Wm. C. responds:
> Only the vertical axis of the beam is affected by the wedge
> prism. The horizontal axis is not (the vert. & horz. elements of
> the image). Therefore as the beam is steered through the prism,
> the further, less retarded part (in your case top) of the beam
> (think of it as swinging through a hinge?) will be wider than
> the bottom... keystoned.
>
> When this keystoned beam images on the screen, it will keystoned
> oppositely. That is, the top now is narrower than the bottom.
> The result is a cancellation of these two keystoning effects,
> rendering a normal image.
I sure don't follow this. Can you explain it a second way?
> In fact I think you'd have a tough time creating a keystoned
> image with any manner of mirrors and/or prisms as long as you
> kept the film parallel to the screen.
I don't think I buy that. I can think of lots of ways of using
mirrors that would be equivalent to tilting the film plane
relative to the screen. Think of it this way: You can see the
projector in a new position when you look at it in the mirror. If
that new position has a different orientation of the projector,
the film will no longer be parallel to the screen.
> I just looked at my Melles Griot price list for '92-'93. Sheese!
> You might think about making a prism out of plexiglass and
> water!?
Yeah, aren't they a trip? I asked them about it maybe ten years
ago but didn't get what I felt was a satisfactory answer. Good
quality stuff, though. Of that there should be no doubt.
OK, the thought of calculating this problem was not something I
looked forward to (can you imagine me not wanting to calculate
something?). So I used an analog computer: I found (That was the
hard part; I _have_ to get organized.) a big light crown wedge
prism in my junk box and did the experiment. First I focussed the
projector on the screen. Next I stuck the prism in the beam and
got an image at a different elevation on the screen. I measured
the keystoning. Then I took out the wedge and changed the angle
of the projector until its image was located where the image was
when the beam went through the prism. I again measured the
keystone. Got exactly the same number. Now what did I do wrong?
I tried it with the apex line horizontal and up and with the apex
line horizontal and down. I'm stumped.
John B
PS: You know, since it doesn't make the situation any worse (at
least if you use a good achromatic prism), and you may want to
keep your projector level for some reason (like the feed of the
reels) maybe the prism is a solution for a different problem other
than keystoning.
------------------------------
|