Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Projection & Viewing
David Hutchison's comments regarding projection vs. viewer are
right on the money for me...
> It's quite true that depending upon your own personal style of
>shooting there can be considerable difference in what makes a good
>slide in the hand viewer and what makes a good slide projected on
>the big screen. When I was still submitting slides for the PSA
>salons and sending in slides for the SSA folios, I had to make very
>careful choices about what slides went where. Many of my slides that
>looked fabulous in the hand viewer vanished into ho-hum land on the
>screen and vice-versa.
Same here. I have had the same experiences... And the reason for
these differences is...
>Much of this had to do with the fact that the hand viewer gives you
>a very bright crystalline image loaded with detail, comparatively
>little of which transfers to the screen in projection.
I could have not stated this any better!
>In general--there are exceptions of course--I kept the big, bold
>compositions with bright subjects in the projection salons and the
>slides with a lot of fussy detail and very wide contrast range in
>the hand viewer circuits.
Thanks David!!! The accuracy of these comments is only surpassed by
the beauty of your 3-d work, the one I've been privilaged to see in
the PSA circuits. You are a great and very experienced stereo
photographer. You could have made a valuable member in our small
email-PSA team. We'll miss you!
George
------------------------------
|