Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: questions, questions
- From: P3D John Bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: questions, questions
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 10:42:15 -0700
Paul Kline writes:
> Try fusing this stereo pair with crossed eyes: | /
>
> I noticed this in one of those ascii stereo pics people use for sigs,
> and was really surprised at the effect. Of course both elements are
> black! So it is not the color of the object, but the differing perspectives
> of the taking apertures/lenses that gives the stereo effect.
I can see I didn't express myself very well if _that's_ what you think
I was suggesting! 8-) Bear with me and let me try again. No doubt I've
violated the law of requisite complexity once more. 8-)
OK, let's say you got a white object at some distance. It images once
through the red side and once through the blue side of the lens. So
you get a white object with a red ghost on one side of it and a blue ghost
on the other. If the white object had been at a different distance, the
ghosts would have gained or lost weight. Now when you go to view this
image, you won't see the two images in the same place; they will be dispaced
from each other.
OK, now we go to a black object. Oops! Aha! Now I see why it works. 8*)
You still get the fringes. They're not of the object but of its background.
But that doesn't matter; it still works. Did I geddit? Did I? Did I?
> I also confess not to understand
> Mr. Bill's thinking here. And I am doing penance by meditating over
> my navel with red-blue glasses on. ...close the left eye...now the
> right one... Repeat the words: 'self similarity...self similarity...'
I don't understand either and I've been trying a _long_ time. Maybe this
penance thing will work. Nothing else has. 8-( Now how does it go again?
John B
------------------------------
|