fuzzy wuzzy

[P3D Gabriel Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lincoln Kamm writes

>There is one huge problem with your idea for getting prints from the
>lenticular camera.  The prints could be far off on briteness and color
>balance, because they would not get printed at the same time, and would be
>effected by the image next to them which would not to often be the same
>lighting situation.
>And you still have to buy a $30-40 viewer (view-magic).  I don't think you
>have thought this out, because you are contradicting yourself.
>
>Are you using disposable lenticular cameras, or the reusable one?

I am not sure of how they actually develop the stuff but you say they 
can be effected by the next image, doesn't the developer have a mask
for the half frames, which would prevent this problem. All I know is
that the prints I get back practically speaking don't have that 
problem that I can notice. I see this problem only when I use a
pair of single use cameras, not with lent cameras.
Yea the view-magic would add about $40 dollars to the total price
tag, but it is still under $100 for the package. If it would be
made on a larger scale, and made in an easier package to manufacter
I am sure it could be priced for $25. Thus $35 for the camera and
$25 for mass produced viewer equals $60. 

Gabriel


------------------------------