Re: PHOTO-3D digest 1534

[P3D Clifford L Davis <mr.3-d@xxxxxxxx>]

Lincoln Kamm wrote:

<The idea that there is no such thing as low quality results is completly
<rediculous.  Are you saying that all results are the same? 
You win a cigar Mack! That's what I'm saying.

<I hope that you were joking, because if you weren't ( I hate to get this
<mean spirited over a general forum, but this one really pissed me off )
then
<you are really a moron!  Iether that, or you hate art in all its forms
and
<you honestly can't tell the difference between an image that has any
thought
<behind it, from the hole in your ass.
Namecalling will get you nowhere man! No, I wasn't joking, no I don't
hate art, I just see the qualities that even so called "poor images"
have. Just because an image was well thought out dosen't mean that it's
any better than a "visual mistake", it just means that it was well
thought out. I have taken random shots of anything and everything except
for the hole in my butt!) without even looking what I'm shooting. They
come out rather nicely and they are actually considered art in some
circles. An image can be art no matter what.....it's just some folks who
spend a lot of time doing a 3Dshot that want you to think that anything
not well thought out is garbage...purely ego.
Everybody can have fun and make art.

-Photography Master Cliff!
********************************************************************************************************************
JOHN GOTTI TRIBUTE PAGE
http://www.Gotti.com


------------------------------