Re: SL3D some more

[P3D Allan Woods <allanwx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>I don't think the analogy applies because we have only one piece
>>of film.

Here I was refering to your analogy of looking at your hand using
a large magnifier and both eyes.

What I meant was that in order to make the analogy more relevant
you should use the magnifier to project the image of your hand
onto a wall or piece of paper - then look at THAT using both
eyes and I doubt you will see your hand in 3-D.

When we look at a photograph, it is that stored projected image
we are viewing (unlike a hologram)...

In the Songer idea...
The apearance of a left-right shift in forground-background objects
is due to the fact that the objects have a coloured tint in the
circle of confusion.  Occluding half of that circle of confusion
yields the apparent left-right shift parallax illusion.

I think what you are trying to make, which can be done, is a
two lense system where both lenses use the same piece of film,
and each lense has a coloured filter to record its image
separately.

That does not sound like "Single-Lense 3-D" to me.



------------------------------