Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: understanding...
- From: P3D John Bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: understanding...
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 10:04:33 -0700
Allan writes:
> John writes:
>> I think of SL3D as just an analog of a two-lensed system, but an
>> anaglyphic one if you like, putting two images down in one locale
>> later to be decoded by color.
> "John, there you go again!" -R. Reagan
You bet. 8-)
[deleted]
> I think what Paul Kline is making is a neat idea - but it is more
> of the "two lenses making two separable images." That is something
> different from "SL3D."
Really?
[deleted]
> John, rhetorically, why can't you take a stereo pair of something
> close to the camera and include something in the frame which
> is apparently at infinity? I can see that with my eyes and look
> near, then far?
Why Allan, here you are asking more questions of me and you haven't
yet answered my questions of you. I'll repeat and give you more of
my questions below.
But to answer this latest of your questions first, I don't know why you
can't go from closeup to infinity in one stereo pair. I only know that
the thing will start to dissociate if you try to shoot it with a normal
stereobase. Maybe Jim C can tell us why, though I don't know if even he
knows this one. However, if you reduce the stereo base by putting the
two lenses close together as in a macro camera or as in SL3D, you won't
have this lack-of-fusion problem any more.
> Is the horse dead again yet?
P'raps not. Is there a veterinarian in the house?
OK, now you have to think about my questions; fair's fair.
The Songer device has a large black vertical line going through its filter.
1) What do you think would happen if that line were made wider yet?
2) What do you think would happen if, in addition, the top and bottom
(only) of that line were widened?
3) What would happen if you took a shot with the red half of the lens
and then advanced the film and took a shot with the blue half of
the lens and then merged the two shots using a computer?
4) What would happen if you instead put the two shots in a viewer and
merged the two shots with your two eyes?
What I'm driving at here is, where do you think it's no longer SL3D and
has instead become separated pairs?
Thanks,
John
------------------------------
|