Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: freeview/assisted view


  • From: P3D John O. Merritt <JOMERRITT@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: freeview/assisted view
  • Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 22:54:35 -0500 (EST)


One way to think about why cross-eye free-viewing makes things look
small is the strong cue to perceived distance:  in crossed viewing,
the two eyes' lines of sight intersect closer than the images you
are looking at, so there is a strong convergence cue to go with 
the retinal images that suggests what you're seeing is smaller
and closer.  You can see this effect when you have a persistent
after-image (as from seeing a photoflash); if you look at a far
building, the after-image looks huge against the building, while
if you look at your palm, the same after-image looks tiny, due to
a constant retinal image size that is interpreted as an external
object size as a function of PERCEIVED distance.  

Un-crossed free viewing results in parallel lines of sight for
the two eyes, so this suggests a far away PERCEIVED distance, and
the same retinal images created by the stereo pair are interpreted
as being "life-size"--or bigger.  The other pesky cue of close
ocular focus can be eliminated by wearing "drug-store" reading
glasses, which change the optical distance of the stereo pair.

Is it "free" viewing if you are "wearing" the stereoscope lenses
as a pair of glasses?

JOM


------------------------------