Re: 3D deja-Vu

[P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >I tend to agree with the general idea about 3D viewer vs. non-viewer 2D.  I'm
> >not too sure about projection because it isn't a *necessary* method, it's
> >just one that I personally like.  A lot.
> 
> I like it, too.  I think I'm just being more objective about it than you.
> You like it so much that you ignore the minor inconveniences of setup and
> takedown.  That's fine-- but don't assume that everybody feels the same
> as you do about it!

Wasn't that.  Did make the assumption that people would be "logical", but
that might not be a good idea either.  With the viewers being much less expensive
than the cameras (when both were new) getting multiple viewers didn't seem like
that big of a deal.  Oh well...

As to setup/teardown.  Groups I show to at home are usually small enough where
the existing sofa's (etc) are just fine.  With the frequency that 35 people are over 
at my house, having a "massive" setup wouldn't be that bad because of 1) Setup
for the party as a whole would be so massive, that the 3D setup would be minor
in comparison and 2) It happens so rarely anyway.

Is having 20~35 people at one's house frequently, 'typical'?  I must live
a sheltered life.  :-)

Mike K.


------------------------------