Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Hyperstereo applications of the 1/30 rule


  • From: P3D John W Roberts <roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Hyperstereo applications of the 1/30 rule
  • Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 09:42:23 -0500


>Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 12:14:23 -0600
>From: "P3D Dr. George A. Themelis" <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Hyperstereo applications of the 1/30 rule

>The 1/30 and similar rules aim in producing a stereo pair that has a
>certain amount of on-film deviation.  For hyperstereos, the 1/30 rule where
>the closest subject is at 30 times the interocular distance and there is
>also infinity present, will result in the same amount of on-film deviation
>as a regular stereo with the closest object at 7 feet and infinity present.

>If there is no infinity present, you will get less on-film deviation.

I agree with all of that, but would add that maximum deviation is not
always the most desirable goal. The first time I tried taking hyperstereos
of the Grand Canyon, I tried to use 1/30 to 1/50 interocular, and got such
extreme depthn that the pictures were very hard to look at. On a second
trip I greatly reduced the interocular, and the results were much better.
William Carter mentioned recreating depth so that the dimensions along
the Z-axis are proportional to the other two - I think that may have
something to do with it.

When taking macro photos I've also had better luck with less than 1/30
interocular. (If I were trying for a very flat subject such as the face
of a coin, I would want much more than that to exaggerate the depth.)

>Practical example:  Suppose you are shooting fireworks.  The 1/30 rule will
>make the firework burst separate from the background (stars?) but
>might not give you adequate depth in-between the burst or different bursts
>within a small area.

I've had a very pleasing amount of depth in fireworks photos using a 4-foot
interocular. (And I *know* the nearest parts of the fireballs were much
more than 120 feet away.) Before I built the 4' bar, I used a 2' bar,
and the pictures had significant depth, though they seemed a little
"flat" to me. I may get the 6' bar built one of these days, then I can
report on that. :-)

John R


------------------------------

End of PHOTO-3D Digest 1679
***************************
***************************
 Trouble? Send e-mail to 
 wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 To unsubscribe select one of the following,
 place it in the BODY of a message and send it to:
 listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
   unsubscribe photo-3d
   unsubscribe mc68hc11
   unsubscribe overland-trails
   unsubscribe icom
 ***************************