Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Ortho or not ortho?


  • From: P3D Jim Crowell <crowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Ortho or not ortho?
  • Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 08:34:49 -0800

At 10:24 AM 12/11/96, P3D Dr. George A. Themelis wrote:
>
>Whether you like ortho it is up to you... Most people find longer FL
>viewing more comfortable and Tim is a good example!  I plan to construct a
>viewer with 100 mm lenses to see if it simulates typical projection viewing
>conditions better...
>

I used to.  Then I made the mistake of buying glasses that don't fit under
my stereoscope hood, so the only way I can view the cards is by taking off
the glasses & bringing the picture stage in _really_ close.  In one respect
that's very bad, because the grain in the prints is pretty darn obvious at
a distance of 2-3 inches.  On the other hand, at that distance they
completely fill the field of view defined by the scope lens apertures, and
I get a _much_ stronger sensation of being in the scene.

-Jim C.

----------------------
Jim Crowell
Division of Biology
216-76
Caltech
Pasadena, CA
(818) 395-8337
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------