Thanks, Mike K!

[P3D Jim Roberts <xjim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you, Mike, for redirecting my little mini-thread back to the topic at
hand, or at least a LOT closer.  

For anyone else who thinks I am an idiot, you are probably right, but please
don't judge me based on my recent posting.  It was meant for a fairly
general audience and omitted lots of technical definitions.  I certainly
don't want to go on record as saying that a CD is 'better' than vinyl,
because there are very definitely audible differences, which means that
personal preferences come into play.  I'm willing to debate off list, if
anyone thinks it is necessary, and I now have a 'canned' response available
vie email which hopefully explains my position a little more clearly.

Regarding digital imaging and stereo photography, it is painfully obvious
that we are at least two generations away from a consumer priced system that
can possibly compare to our beloved [fill in favorite stereo camera here].
I might give up my Realist when we can have a heated discussion about which
is more accurate: 35mm or digital; a discussion which has good arguments for
both sides.  Until then, it's 35mm (or larger) for me all the way.

Jim


------------------------------