Re: Seattle Film Works

[P3D George Gioumousis <georggms@xxxxxxxxxx>]

P3D Jim Crowell wrote
> 
> At 7:59 PM 12/19/96, P3D Derek Gee wrote:
> <deleted>
> >The problems I
> >see in using SFW are:
> >
> >a) The motion picture stock they are using is grainer than the standard
> >   print or slide film.
> >
> >b) The cost for doing this is not that cost effective.
> >
> >c) Motion picture stocks are not as archivally stable as the new
> >   standard films.
> >
> 
> and (d), unlike Dale Labs, for instance, they _won't_ return the slides
> uncut.  So if you're using anything other than 2x2 format (e.g. Realist),
> you're out of luck.
> 
> -Jim C.
> 
and, (e), I thought I could use my Nimslo, cut up the slides, and
remount the outer ones, then get lenticular prints of the rest. I had
forgotten the extra perforation between sets of four, so the slides 
were all mixed up, and some of the cuts were over images. Dale labs
has worked out fine for little tricks like this.
-- 
                           stereo                stereo
George Gioumousis           /---\        |       /---\ 
                             o o         |       o o  
georggms@xxxxxxxxxx           |          |         |   
(415) 494-6276              \===/        |       \===/ 
                           stereo                stereo


------------------------------