Re: Stereo Types

[P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Larry Berlin writes:

>Good try George! I found bits and pieces of myself in the discussion but no
>perfect fit, so I think a *few* things got left out. It makes an interesting
>mirror though! Somewhat artistically arranged with many bits of *mirror*
>facing in many interesting directions. It seems that stereotyping as a
>process is analagous to 2D in that it is a very limited point of view. As
>such it isn't very accurate and is the equivalent not only of 2D but of an
>excessively filtered image at low resolution. 

Yes, exactly, that's why it can make fun reading... Human beings show
infinity varieties and any attempt to classify them will only result in
something innacurate and mostly funny... Thanks for the imput on 
Pro-Digital...  Clearly this is one group that I know the least about...

Two types missing (they are very small groups) are the "Theoritizer" 
(modeled after John B. ;)) and "3D-Hacker" (modeled after, well, we only
have one Master Hacker in this group, Sam Smith).

-- George


------------------------------