Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Terminology and Realist as a weapon
- From: P3D Peter Davis <pfd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Terminology and Realist as a weapon
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:22:40 -0500 (EST)
>>>>> "Dr. T" == P3D Dr George A Themelis <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Yes, every camera has the potential to be a stereo camera. It
>> isn't one until it is used in that manner, but when you do,
>> then it *is* one.
Dr. T> Being used for something or having the potential to be used
Dr. T> as something is not the same as being something. I can use
Dr. T> a Realist as a weapon. That does not make it "a weapon"
Dr. T> but a stereo camera that is being used as a weapon. Same
Dr. T> way, a single camera used for 3d is a single camera used
Dr. T> for stereo and not a stereo camera. That's how I see it.
Dr. T> Otherwise anything could be anything else, which leads to
Dr. T> chaos...
I agree with this. An SLR is NOT a stereo camera, no matter what you
do with it. However, I think the case of a twin rig falls into a gray
area. Basically, it's a stereo camera whose components are themselves
mono cameras. Just a the David White Co. and other camera makers
assembled their cameras from parts, many of which were made by others,
so a twin camera rig is assembled from parts bought elsewhere. The
fact that those parts are usable in and of themselves does not change
the fact that a twin rig is an assembled stereo camera.
-pd
------------------------------
|