Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: *fast* film/Hale Bopp
- From: P3D Bob Wier <wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: *fast* film/Hale Bopp
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 09:58:53 -0600
|
|I would think that some sort of slide bar arrangement would work
|better. It is pretty difficult to keep the camera pointing at the
|same spot when moving the tripod. You should probably try using a
|focusing screen with a cross hair so that you can try and point
|consistently.
Yup - unfortunately I don't have one. I get around that since
virtually everything I do print-wise these days are run thru the computer
and thus I can crop the images and adjust the stereo window. I do have
a tendency to move too much and get hypers, though.
|
|A 40mm lens would probably give you a good image of the comet, but
|light pollution from the town will very likely wipe out the tail.
|
I think the problem from the shoot last night will be the moonlight.
It was pretty clear. At this elevation, on full moon (especially with
a lot of snow on the ground) the sky is visibly blue even at night
with the right weather conditions - (which people don't believe until they see it). We normally don't have much air/light pollution (some, to be sure) but
I generally can walk out on my back doorstep and see the Milky Way without
any eye adjustment time from a fully lit house. I couldn't do that even
in Flagstaff. Of course the town is 4 blocks wide and 6 blocks long
without any great amount of outdoor lighting (generally not allowed due
to the fact that it's a National Historic District). Streetlights mostly -
no neon advertising signs.
|photography contest and has some hints and links to other places. By
|the way, in spite of the hint at the Popular Science home page you
|don't really need extremely fast film for comet photography,
|especially if you are going to include a twon in the foreground.
|
Yeah - I was thinking of maybe trying 400 this evening, but it looks
like it might be moot since the clouds are starting to build in :-(.
So my next chance would be back in Texas, and *there is* a problem
due to the light pollution of Dallas 30 miles off to the west and
the 150% humidity (only a slight exaggeration).
Thanks to everyone who has made suggestions. IF anything turns out,
I'll stick 'me on the web site.
THANKS
====== wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ======
9:57 AM Friday, March 21, 1997
keeper of the Photo-3d, Overland-Trails, LDS State
Research Outline Guides and other stuff
(currently in Ouray, Colorado)
------------------------------
|