Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Mounting techniques
- From: P3D Gregory J. Wageman <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Mounting techniques
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 14:51:52 -0800
Dennis Sherwood elaborates:
>First, let me state there are many different, equally usefull ways to
>mount.
Well, sure! I was hoping to stimulate a discussions of varying approaches
to serve as a sort of survey. I evolved my own technique and your msg.
spurred the thought that it isn't the only way and possibly isn't the
best way.
>However, most techniques are variations of two basic approaches: cut &
>sort or mount as you go. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
>Storing the film in a sorting box as you cut prevents mismatching, and
>allows you to later examine the pairs to decide which ones are worth
>mounting.
Oh, I get it; you put one chip from each pair into the left and right
matching wells of the ice cube tray. Pretty simple! Having never seen
a sorting box, nor a description of one, I hadn't a clue how one would
be used. Now I see.
>As far as sorting is concerned, one could use the witness marks,
>imprinted exposure number, or film sequence besides eyeballing to
>distinguish between right & left pictures.
I've found the witless marks to be an unreliable means of determining
left and right. They depend on the scene being sufficiently well-lit
where it falls on the part of the mask with the indent, and I often find
that they disappear into shadow. Oftentimes they land on a sprocket
hole. Fortunately I have no problems spotting psuedo'd pairs by
free-viewing, usually before I heat-seal them. :-)
>It's what works for you-having a properly mounted and adjusted stereo
pair is the goal.
Of course. But I'm always open to other people's ideas of a better
way.
-Greg W.
------------------------------
|