Re: Nimslo again

[P3D sid herbage <sid@xxxxxxxxxx>]

P3D Derek Gee wrote:
> The main reason for the demise of the
> Nimslo/Nishika is that people just aren't willing to pay that much
> for the limited 3-D effect of the 3 & 4 lens lenticulars.  It was an
> expensive novelty.  

When I bought my Nimslo 7 or 8 years ago (which I bought primarily
for making stereo slides), I did run a couple of rols of print
film and had them processed by Nimslo.

When I showed them around, the reaction was almost the same
everywhere and could be summed up as "delightfully tacky and
great fun for a couple of rolls .... but I'll stick to
regular prints for the family album, thanks".





-- 
    ... Sid (sid@xxxxxxxxxx)


------------------------------