Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: News on Sensia "improvements"


  • From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: News on Sensia "improvements"
  • Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:10:26 -0400 (EDT)

>Many would disagree with you. Some would even go so far as to say 
>that Sensia is totally unacceptable for use in 3D. I know that a 
>lot of folk use it, and I've seen some experienced photographer's 
>work, but to me, the stuff is just too grainy. Doesn't show in some 
>viewers, but it's painfully obvious in a Themelizer.
>Gary Nored

Accepting the risk of sounding "opinionated" I would like to say that I do
not detect any objectionable grain in Sensia 100, even in my "Themelizer".

(Note:  I use fresh film which is exposed quickly and processed within
hours :) after it is exposed.)

I've only seen objectionable grain in Sensia 100 in one instant when I left
a roll exposed but not processed for about 4 months.  This was in the
summer and it is possible that the roll was left in the car and exposed to
high temperatures.

I am talking about Sensia 100.  I have tried 400 and did not like it.

-- George Themelis


------------------------------