Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
RE:New 3d Video product
Greg Erker writes:
> I saw a reference to this web page on rec.video. (I
>have no connection with the company)
>
>They are at:
>http://www.realeyes3d.com/
>
> It is not a pulfrich scam but rather some kind
>of processing box that claims to convert 2d TV into
>3d. It uses LC shutter glasses and appears to support
>movies made in 3d but also makes claims about 3d from
>2d.
>
> The "Get Yours" link has some questions about your
>interest and one choice is "Writing about or reporting
>the Realeyes 3D(TM) technology". Perhaps someone in
>the US could get a review unit for the purpose of
>reporting to photo-3d.
I took a look at this site. It doesn't explain much about what
their processor does, but I can guess. Some months ago I
saw a demonstration of a similar concept based on a PC
with a video capture card and some software. I don't re-
member the company name and maybe it wouldn't be a
good idea to publish it anyway. What that system did was
very simple and unimpressive: Alternate frames were off-
set to make them appear behind the surface of the screen.
One frame was then delayed slightly to create a temporal
disparity. Finally, some simple motion analysis determined
the major direction of motion and controlled which eye's
view was delayed accordingly. (So it is, partially, a
"pulfrich scam")
In other words, like most of the "fake" stereo systems, it
relied mostly on the fact that if you remove the reality of
seeing a flat screen the mind will "make up" a fairly con-
vincing perception of depth. But it falls apart very easily,
and it's very annoying when it does, inducing headaches
and nausea in many people.
The really alarming aspect of the system I saw was that
the manufacturer had (supposedly) won approval from the
FDA to use this system in arthroscopic surgical systems
to provide a "3D" view for the surgeon from a monocular
camera.
You know, stereo imaging has enough problems gaining
acceptance without this sort of @#$% polluting the
public's mind.
Greg Marshall
------------------------------
|