Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

slide vs print


  • From: P3D ron labbe <studio3d@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: slide vs print
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 08:34:27 -0400

> I have a
>state-of-the-art super-duper condition Themelis Red Button viewer, and the
>slides I've viewed look great to be sure, but I haven't seen anything to make
>me think that good prints seen with a good Holmes viewer are inferior.

Prints are always second generation images- never as crisp as originals.They
are best as contact prints which is rarely done.  Also, I've never seen any
color prints- including Cibachromes and dye transfers- with color as
brilliant as with color transparencies- 

I do love the good, classic b&w prints- they were generally done extremely
well. 
No comparison, however (in my opinion) to modern transparencies~



 
ron

ron labbe/ studio 3D
30 glendale st maynard, ma 01754
ph 508 897-4221 mailto:studio3d@xxxxxxxx
http://www.studio3d.com


------------------------------