Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Realist versus Loreo

  • From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Realist versus Loreo
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 14:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
>If anyone sees an error in my methods, or wants give advice, please feel
>free to contact me.

Sam, to be honest, I know what the result is going to be... The bottom line
for me is that those who use a Loreo use it for the convenience and not for
the quality, even though for many the quality is perfectly acceptable.

If you are going to go into this trouble, perhaps you can include a few more
cameras in the testing lab.  I would like to know if a 2.8 is sharper than
the 3.5 and if the Realist Ektar or the Custom are sharper than the 2.8. 
Also, how does the Kodak and Belplasca compare.  Not that this will change
my preferences... but I am curious...

-- Curious George Themelis


------------------------------