Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Pulfrich and Real vs. Artifial 3D

  • From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Pulfrich and Real vs. Artifial 3D
  • Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 23:40:25 -0400 (EDT)
>With this logic I would take it to mean using one camera to capture
>3D by shifting, to be artificial??? Of course not. So why is Pulfrich
>artificial? The end result of Pulfrich, is true stereoscopic viewing.

Sorry Gabriel, but you did not understand what I just said.

Pulfrich is true stereoscopic viewing but I choose to call it "artificial"
because the sense of depth is a result of relative movement and not real
depth in the scene.

-- George Themelis


------------------------------