Re: Pulfrich and Real vs. Artifial 3D

[P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I just want to elaborate in my last post, that the connotation is
>that Pulfrich is not stereoscopic (by others, not Dr.T) which is
>blatantly false or at the very least, misleading to call it an 
>illusion. That's why I am always surprised to read this in alot
>of places but no PLAUSIBLE explanation is given as to why. 

And I would like to say that it is OK with me to call Pulfrich 
a Stereoscopic ILLUSION!!! :-)

>Gabriel signing off for tonight. -)

Come on Gabriel!  The night is still young!  Stay up and party with
Dr. T. (I think I've written this last sentence before in P3D)
How about a joke about Pulfrich Chicken?  Spamming sell-3d Chickens?

-- George Themelis


------------------------------