Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Converging lenses (was: Window reversal); D|s-TortiO|\|s


  • From: P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Converging lenses (was: Window reversal); D|s-TortiO|\|s
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:27:23 -0700

> While talking about keystoning and resulting distortions, the assumption
> is being made (but not stated) that a parallel viewing system is used.
> This means either a viewer with parallel lenses or projection with 
> parallel projecting lenses.  Of course, this is usually the case, BUT it 
> does not have to be so.  

My reading of the thread was that introduction of keystoning was claimed
to be one of the ABSOLUTE no-no's.  That is, it was under ALL conditions a 
fault and unacceptable.  I've come up with examples that I think refute that
notion.  Even one that's not using artistic reasoning.

In terms of being a guideline (probably a strong-ish guideline) that
shouldn't be violated w/o reason, then I'm all for it.  Generally speaking,
keystoning isn't something desirable to inject into our image taking.

But *sometimes* it can be "a good thing" (pardons to a certain un-named woman).

Mike K.


------------------------------