Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Converging lenses (was: Window reversal); D|s-TortiO|\|s
- From: P3D Michael Kersenbrock <michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Converging lenses (was: Window reversal); D|s-TortiO|\|s
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 18:27:23 -0700
> While talking about keystoning and resulting distortions, the assumption
> is being made (but not stated) that a parallel viewing system is used.
> This means either a viewer with parallel lenses or projection with
> parallel projecting lenses. Of course, this is usually the case, BUT it
> does not have to be so.
My reading of the thread was that introduction of keystoning was claimed
to be one of the ABSOLUTE no-no's. That is, it was under ALL conditions a
fault and unacceptable. I've come up with examples that I think refute that
notion. Even one that's not using artistic reasoning.
In terms of being a guideline (probably a strong-ish guideline) that
shouldn't be violated w/o reason, then I'm all for it. Generally speaking,
keystoning isn't something desirable to inject into our image taking.
But *sometimes* it can be "a good thing" (pardons to a certain un-named woman).
Mike K.
------------------------------
|