Re: Converging lenses (was: Window reversal); D|s-TortiO|\|s

[P3D Gabriel Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Hi Gabriel!  How does it feel to get back to work after a holiday? :-)

Great! I pretend I work, they pretend they pay me! ;-)
(old russian saying)

>>Mike, I think your missing the point. 
>
>Who's missing what? 

Ah shucks George, you must be kidding me! The point is why would
you want to introduce keystone and KEEP it. The keystoning of
the beamsplitter occured to me also but had nothing to do with
the discussion, so I didn't bring it up. 

>My recollection is that the discussion started when the statement
>was made that "educated" consumers...er... stereo photographers
>use parallel lenses.  This has put Mike K. and myself in a race
>to find VALID reasons to use keystoning.  And we are doing pretty
>well, as far as I can tell :-)

As I said, the original impetutus was to introduce Keystoning and
keeping it. (boy am I tired of repeating myself) Check the archives.

>Yes, thank you.  I am here... :-)  Come on Gabriel!  Be open minded!

But I am! If I wasn't, I wouldn't be listening! I am just trying not
to get sidetracked by arguments that are not relevent to the
discussion.

>There are always two points of view in stereo photography (Ron Labbe
>says that, not me).  Mike K. and myself have shown you the second
>point of view that you guys have rejected.  You want more?  I am 
>going to dig out the article I mentioned earlier and get back to
>you.  That's a promise and a threat!
>
>"Open-minded" (not really... :-))  George

Well, I see you won't let me go over the horizon, so will wait to see
what you come up with, that is relevent to this discussion. 


------------------------------