Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Converging lenses, or Breaking Rules
- From: P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Converging lenses, or Breaking Rules
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:35:31 -0400 (EDT)
1-2 degrees rotation is a rather small error, leading to 0.5 mm of vertical
offest in the worse case (furthest from center, etc.) which is incapable
of generating the results you are describing. I would say that 1 deg.
rotation (resulting to 0.2 mm offset at the edge of the Realist frame)
can be unnoticed by unexperienced individuals.
Many of the scientific images I am dealing with (SEM stereopairs, fusing of
tensile deformation samples, etc.) contain more vertical misalignment than
that, yet I have not felt the symptoms that you describe.
This is not to suggest that a person should not be careful to eliminate
such errors. Only that the effects of having to deal with these errors
are greatly exaggerated.
Respectfully submitted,
-- George Themelis
>mounting a good stereo pair but with one
>image rotated by a degree or two about the center results in an image
>that can't be perceived as two DIFFERENT images, but instead causes
>pain or disorientation to the point of revulsion.
>KLUKER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|