Re: WWW-Paper on Stereo 3-D

[P3D Sam Smith <3dhacker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your URL that you listed is a little off because of the period. The dirct
link should be:

http://takeo.kulab.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~Morris/Cote.HTM

It's an interesting piece of work Morris, congratulations on the task.

Yiou may want to reconsider lines like:



>(Be warned,
>however, that both the photographic resolution of the picture and the
stereographic
>impact of its three-dimensional effect tend to be lower in quality in the
case of lenticular
>prints than those routinely obtained by stereo pairs taken with even the
cheapest
>disposable cameras.

I understand your point, but I'm sure there are some on this list who have
experienced some incredible large lenticulars which were quite amazing.
Kodak apparently has there own process which may give you second thoughts.
It wouldn't be fair to just compare little 3 1/2 x 5 lents from Nimslo
format cameras, although, I don't believe you mention what it is you were
comparing.

I'm not sure why you divided the processes into one image/ two image
sections, with anaglyphs, polarized projection and lenticulars in the
one-image section. These processes are indeed two or more images combined,
and all processes become a single depth image as an end result anyway.

You may also want to include Vectographs and Chroma-depth if you are
evaluating as many processes as you can.


Sam


------------------------------