Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Perseids, After Hours
I'm very groggy this morning because I spent the entire night five
miles south of the Great Salt Lake photographing the Perseid Meteor
Shower in stereo. I don't have the results yet, but I believe they
will not be favorable. The stereo setup was fine, I believe: My
son Adam and I were separated by just under two miles to give a base
of about one-thirtieth the distance to the 60-mile high meteors. We
aimed the two cameras so that Alpheratz was centered side-to-side and
slightly above center vertically. We synchronized our watches so
that we could squeeze the two cable releases at about the same time.
We were using 28 mm lenses so we could capture a broader portion of
the sky than we got last year with 50 mm lenses (last year I got part
of one meteor in one shot, Adam got none.) Beginning at 1:05 a.m. we
shot simultaneous shots on 36-exposure Kodacolor Royal Gold 400 film,
pressing the cable release on the five-minute mark, exposing for one
minute, then waiting four minutes for the next shot.
Problem: The dozens of meteors we saw almost all occured during the
eighty-percent of the time when the shutters were closed. Those that
came during the twenty-percent of the time the shutters were open
were mostly all over the sky except where our cameras were pointed.
You pays your money and takes yer choice when pointing at potential
meteor places! We were aiming about fifteen or twenty degrees south
of the radient in Perseus. Had we been aiming twenty degrees
northeast of the radiant, we would have had some great successes!
Problem: I should have followed my intuition and changed the battery
in my Minolta BEFORE the session. I had had no failures on these
batteries yet, so I thought they would probably last through the
session. The batteries failed on the third shot (the camera went
dead) so I missed one five-minute sequence while I changed batteries.
Problem: The clouds in the east were illuminated by lights from Salt
Lake City, across the Oquirrh mountain range, and probably outshone
the meteors. They also obscured some of the meteors, but were thin
enough that we could see the meteors through the clouds. I think we
should have pointed northwest--the sky seemed darker there, with no
clouds, mostly. But at times during the night, the sky was almost
perfectly cloudless.
Problem: Around 4:30 a.m. I was getting cold and I realized we
probably didn't have any good stereo pairs yet, so I drove the two
miles to tell Adam to change the protocol: We'd open the lens for
2.5 minutes then wait for 2.5 minutes, so we would be SURE to get
some shooting stars, even at the cost of having the fixed stars
create trails because of the stationary cameras. That excursion
caused us to miss two paired exposures. Walky talkies would have
been a good tool.
Problem: During the second of the longer exposures, a beautiful
meteor shot down exactly mid-view, and I cheered, knowing we had a
success at last. But as I took down the camera at five a.m. I
noticed that at some time during the night the low temperature and
the moist pasture had combined to put a heavy coat of dew all over my
lens--I have no idea when it came, but I'm certain it was before that
great shot!
I'll get the rolls developed and contact-sheet printed tonight, and
then spend some time planning for next year. I think I know what
I'll change. My night in the pasture was contemplative and serene,
and cost me only a few hours of sleep, so I feel somewhat
compensated, even if there are no stereo meteor shots. It was less
expensive than a trip to Greece.
Ken Luker
_______________________________________________________________
Kenneth Luker
Marriott Library Systems and Technical Services
KLUKER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|