re:Your Stereo Camera

[P3D Webmaster <stereoscopic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert Hattenhauer writes:

> With 1000 readers, but few active, perhaps some would like to get involved in
> talking about the stereo camera that they like the best and why.


Robert.....

Thanks for posting your question....it's always interesting to see what
other stereo photographers ENJOY!  Here are a few of my impressions:

The Wollensak (and the Revere) are my favorites...they are very easy to
handle and produce consistent results (and spacing between exposures). 
I also am very pleased with the appearance of the camera too...that kind
of thing certainly adds to my enjoyment in using it.  In general, the
operation of these cameras is very intuitive.  And I like the "feel" of
the camera.

The lenses on the Wirgin Edixa produce very sharp results, thought the
film advance seems to be one wrong move away from destruction...it seems
so fragile...yet it has a convenient flash output and is light and easy
to hold.  Although it's sort of flimsy, it has nice lenses, has produced
some great slides.... and has been FUN to use.

Also, I've been surprised by the good results with Kodaks I've
used...and, actually, they have a very nice viewfinder (and level) if
you've got one that's been taken care of.

I think it's enjoyable to own and use a variety of stereo
cameras...vintage and new...and to switch between them often.  Each
camera has it's own qualities and personality...and much satisfaction
can be derived from experiencing all of them.  Surely for some the
stereo experience is a "done deal,"  comprised of formulas and specs
indicating a limited range of choices.   But I find using my cameras a
more personal experience.  Perhaps, when it comes to stereo photography,
I'm less than  a realist.

Joe Safferson


------------------------------