Re: Full frame disposable?

[P3D Alan Lewis <dlewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Greg Erker writes:
> Either someone thinks like
>me or listens to my blathering about John Public
>wanting his one hour 4x6 prints.

I just blather like you.

 > A couple of minor points: You do mention about
>the prints being labelled. But for the public
>to have minimal trouble the prints should be
>back printed "LEFT and RIGHT". Don't know if
>that's what you meant.

Fantasy's are free.  So let's do it right. L & R it is. :-)


 > Better yet would be if the paper cutter in
>the print machine was modified to spit out
>4x12's (like when they print the so called
>panoramic prints). Then the print would be
>ready for 2d and 3d viewing. (The machine
>would have to print the negs out of order.
>1 and 3 on one 4x12, then 2 and 4 on the next.)
>Might make a big difference in consumer
>acceptance.

That shouldn't be a problem.  Grand Photo already did this for the
Realist print monolith dimensions.  

 > Plus if the consumer doesn't want to keep
>all of the 3d prints they could just cut it
>in half and give one image away (just like
>double prints). 

That would confirm most people's belief that I use a two lens camera to
get double prints.  That's what they say to me sometimes!


-- 
_______________________________________________________________
Alan Lewis
mailto:dlewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Home of the stereo wedding package, and weekend stereo projects
http://www.arlington.net/homes/dlewis


------------------------------