P3D Re: Re: Stereo Camera Limitations

[fotoschack@xxxxxxxxx (Gary Schacker)]

The current discussion of the difficulties of filter usage on the
traditional stereo cameras I think presents a strong argument in favor
of twin SLR's for stereo.
(or RBT's)

I was fortunate enough to take a trip to Vermont last month for my first
try at photogahing world class fall color. (I live in San Diego)  I hit
the place just as color was peaking and the weather was almost perfect
every day.  I was able to employ both polarizers and Tiffen enhancing
filters.  I also took some back-up shots with my trusty Revere.  The
comparison
of the results is revealing.  The Revere shots are pleasant enough but
only the SLR pairs come close to conveying the true beauty of the place.  

I believe it would be hard to argue against the fact that the more
advanced one gets, the greater the desire to use the tools  and
techniques available in modern photography. I love my stereo cameras, 3
Realists, a Revere and a Kodak, and I was completely satisfied with them
for years.  Now however, I bump into their limitations more and more.

I suppose it depends on your objectives. 
The 50's cameras are great for general photography, documentaing family,
kids etc, which I suppose is why they were made.  They are unbeatable
where quickness counts and where tripods are
restricted.  I always take one along on my photo excursions.  They come
up short however for the type of contemplative work that yields the
really striking images.  
Take a look at the best work being presented at NSA conventions these
days.
Very little of it is being produced with 50's cameras.

Gary Schacker


------------------------------