P3D Who are you calling a "fanatic"??? :-)

["Dr. George A. Themelis" <DrT-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We heard:

>George, your prejudice is showing.  The Kodak camera is a fine machine.

and:

>...George, while a really nice guy, is not a good source for why you 
>should use a Kodak, since he is a Realist fanatic.

Common fellows!  Did my fine sense of humor get you off-guard? :-)   
Two postings, back to back in the same digest.  At least I did not 
hear from any Realist fan regarding IQ tests, out-of-level pictures, 
double-exposures, "ooopps" and "frozen smiles", etc.

>Just a comment (MHO)... I think George put out two very clever messages
>this afternoon that were meant to be read as a pair. Each
>over-emphasized some of the humor that has been beaten around this list
>over the years about the two kinds of cameras. I laughed a bit... I
>don't think this was a serious as some of you have taken it! George, am
>I right, or did I miss the boat completely and laugh anyway? =)
>Dan Shelley

AS ALWAYS dead right Dan!  And THANK YOU for clearing up the confusion!

Kodak or Realist, slides or prints, Fujichrome or Kodachrome... 
tough choices... I have my own preferences but after several years 
of debating these issues I believe I have reached the maturity to 
recognize that the other side has some valid points too. :-)

-- George Themelis


------------------------------