P3D Leah and Cross-Eyed Viewing

[Ron Fredrickson <RLF@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In response to Ron's note:

>Far too much emphasis, IMHO, on stuff that doesn't matter! How dead can we
>beat this horse? If Leah looks stretched to you, it may not to others (it
>doesn't to me! In fact, the image of Kurt Steel. just above, looks MORE
>stretched to me!) When Dr T first looked at his first stereo images, they
>looked cardboarded- now they don't. Why all the fuss? Stereo is always
>going to be a compromise! I'd much rather look at specific images and talk
>about them (like Boris has begun here) instead of rambling about theory...
>What do others think of the aforementioned images?
>

Leah looks OK to me, and I agree that stereo imaging is an imperfect medium
with perpetual compromises. Still I would never give up enjoying 3-D images
for themselves under any circumstances.

Another item for me with these is the fact that it has been only VERY
recently and because of P-3D that I have, after 40 years in stereo, been
able to do any successful cross-eyed viewing. By following the directions
provided by some members of the group I can see these images in depth, but
still not comfortably. Parallel viewing has always been very easy for me;
cross-eyed now possible. Thanks.

Ron Fredrickson 


------------------------------