Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: 3-D or not 3-D (was: computer 3D again)
- From: michaelk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Kersenbrock)
- Subject: P3D Re: 3-D or not 3-D (was: computer 3D again)
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:32:32 -0800
> So, I guess I'm casting my vote to standardize.
To tell the truth, it's rare that there's anyone who would
vote against standardization so long as *their* way is that
being made standard. :-)
Mike K.
P.S. - I think "format" is the "storage format". You used the
phrase "Realist 5 perf format" and "Tru-Vu Filmstrip format"
and others along this line. These are NOT examples of
viewing but are examples of "storage". These examples
may be generated by any of multiple methods which are very
different and they can be viewed by many ways which can
be very different (projecter vs viewer, for instance). The
constant is the storage (and interperson transfer) format.
Viewers for instance, can then be compatible with multiple
formats -- say 5P, 7P, and 8P formats -- or not. Likewise
with generation implementations. So, as long as my view is that
to be made standard, I vote for standardization too! :-)
------------------------------
|