P3D Re: PHOTO-3D digest 2677

[Peter Davis <pd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Looks much better, though I see what you mean about the "scan lines"  Can
you tell us what Eric's suggestions were?

Thanks,

-pd


At 05:42 PM 4/16/98 , you wrote:
>
>After 2 more hours work, improved the picture scanned with
>the HP
>Slide Adapter a little, with suggestions from Eric
>Goldstein. Put up
>the new version under the old one.
>
>The main problem with the device is that it introduces
>artifacts
>which look like scan lines. Maybe this is the result of the
>light
>source being bounced off of two "mirrors" before it hits the
>slide. Maybe someone will figure out how to fix this
>problem.
>
>All in all, not too bad (for $10-I recommend getting 2 so
>you
>won't need to re-position the slide.) The original scans
>were
>about twice as large as those seen on my Web page. I
>re-sampled them to the smaller size for easy freeviewing.
>About 500 pixels wide for each image would be about
>the max for a 600 dpi scanner, so the output would be OK
>for Web pages, but that's about all.
>
>Jeff Jessee
>
>http://www.iag.net/~jeffjess
> 


------------------------------