P3D Re: JPG and destruction

[William Carter <wc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jon Gross writes:

>the subtle horizontal boundaries which are cues to our visual
>system and provide the physiological stimuli that are MAJOR COMPONENTS
>IN THE STEREOSCOPIC EFFECT are encoded in JPEG (and JPS) as MINOR HIGH
>FREQUENCY COMPONENTS, the first ones to be "rounded down to zero", i.e.
>fuzzed out!  FINE for monoscopic images, BAD for stereoscopic images.

MPEG-2 compresses by looking at the last frame, comparing it to the present
frame, and projecting that to anticipate the next frame. Not good for high
definition broadcast 3D video. It's objective is to minimize irrelevant
information, but in the case of 3-D, it compresses and obscures the relevant
information.

Any thoughts out there on how to improve MPEG-2 for stereo? 


------------------------------