P3D Re: JPG destruction

[Jim Crowell <crowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 5:35 AM -0700 4/27/98, John W Roberts wrote:
>>Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 09:20:58 -0600
>>From: William Carter <wc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: P3D Re: JPG destruction
>
>>The very bad news is:
>>John Bercovitz, and some others on this list, ran some tests which showed
>>that certain screen phosphors (as I recall, green) were illuminated by a non
>>corresponding signal (I think it was red). You may not be able to get a good
>>anaglyphic reproduction off a monitor?!?
>
>Wouldn't red/blue be the least likely to have crosstalk, at least in terms
>of the phosphors' spectral emissions?
>
>John R

Probably, but typically it's also far & away the dimmest of the three
phosphors, several times dimmer than the green (which tends to be the
brightest).  I played around with it a few years back & the murkiness using
blue was more annoying than the ghosting using green...

-Jim C.

----------------------
Jim Crowell
Caltech Division of Biology
Mail Code 216-76
1200 E. California Blvd.
Pasadena, CA 91125
Tel: (626) 395-8337
Fax: (626) 795-2397
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://vis.caltech.edu/~jim/Home.html




------------------------------

End of PHOTO-3D Digest 2696
***************************