Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D JPG destruction
- From: Ole Hansen <oha@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D JPG destruction
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 08:55:24 +0200
Boris Starosta <boris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My turn! Ole's ad hominem attack on the Chinese aside....
It is not an attack. I just commented on the scientific level
of this particular mail. I guess, that you are aware of the fact,
that scientiest are employed to improve their own, and later
yours and my knowledge, and not to promote ignorance ?
> I can comment only on my personal subjective experiences
> with JPEG, which have been both very good (as far as image
> quality goes), and very bad (as far as getting others to
> accept the high quality of such files).
I did not ask you or anyone else to look at your anaglyps.
I invited you and everybody else to look at my anaglyphs,
and to comment on them, but you did not. Why not ?
> People seem to be biased against JPEG....
This way of arguing is close to religius warfare. I do not
accept it. Please consider the questions asked, and do not
use "I have heard...", "People tells me...", and as in this
case "People seem...."
> most people have seen only poor quality JPEG compression
> (i.e. high compression ratios). Perhaps this is Ole's problem
> with the images on his site....
Even with very low compression (PhotoImpact - High quality)
there are ghosting and other errors, and the files are as big
as PNG files.
> The images on my site, including anaglyphs, are also all JPEGs
I am aware of that, and some of your anaglyphs are as distorted
as some of mine.
> I wonder if maybe his source files were JPEGs....
I wonder why you do not reed the text that you are commenting ?
> The ghosting you see there on the JPG's is not present in the
> original PNG anaglyphs....
Having so corrected your misunderstanding, I (we) are still
looking for advice about red/cyan glasses of proper quality.
Until now - no responce. How can you and others evaluate
anaglyphs without using the proper glasses ?
And if you use a proper type of glasses, why dont you tell
me where to get them ?
Best regards - Ole Hansen - olehansen@xxxxxxxxx
------------------------------
|